Search for: "M.P. v. Department of Children and Family Services" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
Daviess County Department of Child Services (NFP) - "Appellants-respondents Leanna and Daniel Fitzgerald bring this consolidated appeal from the trial court's order terminating their respective parental relationships with M.P., S.F., and D.F. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's the factual and procedural story: This contempt proceeding followed K.A.'s contentious divorce from C.P., the father of their three daughters, K.P., L.P., and M.P., as well as the family's involvement in two dependency and neglect cases…. [read post]