Search for: "M.S. v M.S." Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
(Even if the bus driver saw the fall, that was not enough to establish an awareness that M.S. suffered any injuries.)The AD1 thought M.S. also failed to establish a “reasonable excuse for the delay. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
”Given that he did not close, nor supplied any evidence that he had the wherewithal to do so, the AD1 didn’t think M.S. could assert a viable claim for relief and allowed the dismissal to stand.That certainly closed that.# # #DECISIONS. v 1986-F&S of N.Y., Ltd. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The European Court in M.S. v United Kingdom has not carved out a right to treatment; it has extended the right to be protected from indignity in detention that is already well-recognised in its jurisprudence (Keenan v United Kingdom). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer S.A.S. v. [read post]