Search for: "MACANDREWS "
Results 41 - 60
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
AM General Holdings LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:07 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holding, Inc., Weinberger v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
This was a case where the Schedule TO indicated that counsel to MacAndrews & Forbes and counsel to the Special Committee then cooked up the Exchange Offer as an alternative. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Hldgs, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, 182 (Del. 1986). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), would not apply. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
He stayed for a decade, then left to join MacAndrews & Forbes, the investment vehicle Ron Perelman used as the platform for his hostile takeovers (or, more politely, shareholder activism). [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:14 pm
., No. 334, 2013 (March 14, 2014) The Delaware Supreme Court today affirmed the Court of Chancery’s decision granting summary judgment to the defendants under the business judgment standard of review (and not the entire fairness standard) where the controlling stockholder MacAndrews & Forbes conditioned its offer upon the MFW Board agreeing, ab initio, to two procedural protections, i.e., approval by a Special Committee and by a majority of the minority stockholders. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
This was a case where the Schedule TO indicated that counsel to MacAndrews & Forbes and counsel to the Special Committee then cooked up the Exchange Offer as an alternative. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., Nos. 353, 354, 1985, opinion (Del. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:13 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
MacAndrews & Forbes - i.e., that Data Domain's directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to take steps to obtain the best price reasonably available, by granting/permitting preclusive deal protection provisions and by failing to inform themselves. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:26 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986)). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Michael Hayden, Principal, The Chertoff Group; Former Director, Central Intelligence Agency; Former Director, National Security Agency Matt Olsen, President and Co-Founder, IronNet Cybersecurity; Former Director, National Counterterrorism Center John Pistole, President, Anderson University; Former Administrator, Transportation Security Administration; Former Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation Fran Townsend, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Government, Legal, and Business Affairs,… [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:14 am
.)), senior counsel, CFPB Justice Stephen BreyerMichael Bosworth (Yales 2003 / Katzmann / Kakoff), counsel at MacAndrews & ForbesKaren Dunn (Yale 2006 / Garland), partner at Boies SchillerEric J. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:45 pm
In its Motion, Renco argued that the Court was requiring it to assume a duty to inquire whether its business partner, MacAndrews AMG (“AMG”), was complying with its contractual obligations and also that the Court improperly concluded that equitable tolling applied only in instances where the contracting parties had a fiduciary relationship. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., becomes to maximize the value of the sale of the company for the benefit of its shareholders. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:54 pm
Analysis The first issue focused on whether communications between in-house counsel for MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:54 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holding, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, 182 (Del. 1986), the Court of Appeals held that those common law duties are triggered once the Board has determined to sell the corporation. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:05 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, in the change-of-control context, the directors’ role changes “from defenders of the corporate bastion to auctioneers charged with getting the best price for the stockholders at a sale of the company. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (1986), the Court declared that a company’s board must strive to ensure that the shareholders receive best price if it decides to allow the sale of the company. [read post]
