Search for: "MAINELY MEDIA LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  A public official’s social media activity constituted state action under §1983 only if the official both (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking on social media. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Three Frog, LLC, Opposition No. 91255161 (March 29, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
Wendt, CEO of Feller & Wendt, LLC, a personal injury law firm, serving clients in Utah, Idaho, and Arizona. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am by Edward T. Kang
Reprinted with permission from the January 23, 2024 edition of “The Legal Intelligencer” © 2024 ALM Media Properties, LLC. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A little less than a year after admitting guilt, Watkins registered a company called Huxley Rock LLC. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Lidl Great Britain v Tesco Stores [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch) and [2023] EWHC 1517 (Ch) (April, June 2023)This spring/summer blockbuster stretches to 317 paragraphs in its main judgment plus another 50 in the form of order judgment. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
However, I don’t expect his “expert” services will be in high demand going forward LOL. * * * Arkansas Act 689 of 2023 NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by jonathanturley
Corizon, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-405-NT, 2015 WL 8664209, at *8 (D. [read post]
The difficulty businesses around the country have had finding and hiring workers has gained extensive media attention. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by INFORRM
The jurisprudence presented in this paper is divided into three main sections: Cases against intermediaries, cases against public officials, and cases dealing with the actions taken by states to enforce a particular kind of content moderation on private social media platforms. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am by Barry Barnett
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Main ground for deeming patent case “baseless” “wholly lacks merit”. http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1099.OPINION.5-23-2023_2131192.pdf Lack of detail on LLC members endangers trial outcome. http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/22-1389P-01A.pdf Declaration that defendant sold more than $5 million of relevant product in state met test for removal of class-action case to federal court… [read post]