Search for: "MANNING v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al" Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, July 28, 2010 A $13 million settlement has been reached between four parties and the United States to expedite cleanup of the contaminated Blackburn and Union Privileges Superfund Site in Walpole, Mass., the Justice Department and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Serious ESG investors recognize their limitations, and their centrality in the ESG debate is a straw man. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
Background James Man started a sugar trading business in 1783, that became Man Financial and ultimately, the publicly traded MF Global, some 230 years later. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]