Search for: "MARCHAK V. CLARIDGE COMMONS, INC., ET AL." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Because of the favored status afforded to arbitration, an agreement to arbitrate should be read liberally in favor of arbitration
8 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by PaulKostro
BURLINGTON VOLKSWAGEN, INC., ET AL., __ N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A court may not enter an order compelling arbitration sua sponte or on the request of one party absent a statute or an agreement of the parties compelling resolution of the dispute in that manner
2 Oct 2009, 9:49 am
Claridge Commons, Inc., 134 N.J. 275, 282, (1993); Angrisani v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Where the parties agreed to binding arbitration to resolve any and all fee-related disputes, claims of breach relevant to a reduction of the fee sought are within the scope of their agreement; however, affirmative claims for consequential damages incurred
19 May 2010, 3:07 pm by PaulKostro
., ET AL. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Consequential damages are those fairly and reasonably contemplated by the parties at the time of the execution of the contract
11 Aug 2010, 9:29 am by PaulKostro
Claridge Commons, Inc., 134 N.J. 275, 282 (1993) (citing Jacobs v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Arbitration of medical malpractice claims
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
Claridge Commons, Inc., 134 N.J. 275, 282 (1993)). [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues