Search for: "MARINO BY MARINO v. Marino"
Results 21 - 40
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
Didn't Obergefell–favorably citing West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:19 pm
Marino v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:08 am
Here, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the willful and contumacious character of its conduct could properly be inferred from its repeated failures, without an adequate excuse, to timely respond to discovery demands and to comply with the Supreme Court’s orders to provide outstanding discovery and set a date for the plaintiff’s deposition (see Marino v Armogan, 179 AD3d 664, 666 [2020]; Broccoli v Kohl’s Dept. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 3:04 am
“[B]are legal conclusions and factual claims which are flatly contradicted by the record are not presumed to be true” (Parola, Gross & Marino, P.C. v Susskind, 43 AD3d 1020, 1021-1022 [2007]). [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:23 am
The recent decision of Marino Belen v Marino, 2020 ONSC 6124, is a reminder to parents that while changes to family dynamics should be embraced, it must be balanced against social circle guidelines in the new Covid19 era. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the attorney’s negligence” (Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; see Ferrigno [*2]v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d at 652; Marino v Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salibury & Cambria, LLP, 87 AD3d 566). [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
Marino, 183 A.D.3d 813, 820, 123 N.Y.S.3d 638). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:27 am
Here, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the willful and contumacious character of its conduct could properly be inferred from its repeated failures, without an adequate excuse, to timely respond to discovery demands and to comply with the Supreme Court’s orders to provide outstanding discovery and set a date for the plaintiff’s deposition (see Marino v Armogan, 179 AD3d 664, 666 [2020]; Broccoli v Kohl’s Dept. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:03 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am
, Lewis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:18 pm
Tras vencerse el término para la evaluación de la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced, quedó vetada la medida que ordenaba un programa piloto de control de contaminación por ruido en la zona de los cayos y Playita Rosada de la Reserva Natural de La Parguera en Lajas. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS lease production… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of a lessee’s ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 8:29 am
Este proyecto de ley llegó a la Fortaleza el 21 de julio de 2020 y se encuentra ahora ante la consideración de la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced. [read post]
