Search for: "MARIUS V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2007, 10:11 pm
In Korematsu v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
Contents include:Amaney Jamal & Helen V. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz•… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
Marius NedelcuCharter of Rights and Freedoms: Marius Nedelcu took the victim for a ride on their employer’s motorcycle. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:02 am
Rizk v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
In this regard, Hadley v Kemp is not an isolated instance (see Rockford Map Publishers at 148-9; Miller v Civil City of South Bend at 1093-5; Garcia v Google at 742-3). [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Marius Mellebye. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
As previously stated, the series is the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa (in alphabetical order): Caroline Wanjiru (Centre for IP and IT Law, Strathmore University, Kenya); Chinasa Uwanna and Ekene Chuks-Okeke (Banwo & Ighodalo, Nigeria); Marius Schneider and Nora Ho Tu Nam (IPvocate Africa, Mauritius); Vanessa Ferguson (Ferguson Attorneys, South Africa). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:04 am
As stated in the first post on this series, the series is the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa (in alphabetical order): Caroline Wanjiru (Centre for IP and IT Law, Strathmore University, Kenya); Chinasa Uwanna and Ekene Chuks-Okeke (Banwo & Ighodalo, Nigeria); Marius Schneider and Nora Ho Tu Nam (IPvocate Africa, Mauritius); Vanessa Ferguson (Ferguson Attorneys, South Africa). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
The first 2 posts covered copyright and trade marks.As previously stated, the series is the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Caroline Wanjiru Muchiri (Centre for IP and IT Law, Strathmore University, Kenya); Ekene Chuks-Okeke (Banwo & Ighodalo, Nigeria); Marius Schneider and Nora Ho Tu Nam (IPvocate Africa, Mauritius); Ruth Mulenga Sinkala (PhD Candidate, University of Cape Town), Vanessa Ferguson, Sibongile… [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:00 pm
Also in March, the Federal High Court of Nigeria (Lagos) nullified two registered designs belonging to the respondent inWest African Cotton Company Limited (WACCL) v Hozelock Exel, on the grounds that they were not new. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Weideman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
Hammer v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
Malleiro v. [read post]
