Search for: "MARK T. v. DCS, et al."
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 2:41 pm
Bain, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Justice O'Connor cited it in the plurality opinion in Hamdi et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
REES, et al. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
Those with an interest in climate policy have lined up on their respective sides — environmentalists supporting Mann, skeptics supporting Steyn, et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
KSR v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
The brief by Google, et al., takes this a step further than the normal “lack of time” and “incompetence” statements – arguing that the current law and practice “tilt the scales heavily in favor of granting patent applications based on incomplete analyses. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Source Photonics, Inc. et al. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Beall, Karen F., et al., eds. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
Deandre Cortez Way et al (1709 Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions 4th Circuit: Post-purchase confused restroom users: Georgia Pacific Consumer Products v Von Drehle Corporation (The Trademark Blog) TTAB precedential no. 31: Opposer fails to prove priority, non-use, and fraud in BLACK BELT TV brouhaha (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
Id. at 56,762 & n.921 (citing Chris Cernich et al., IRRC Inst. for Corporate Responsibility, Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards (May 2009), available at www.irrcinstitute.org/pdf/IRRC_05_09_EffectiveHybridBoar ds.pdf, and J. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:40 pm
Sahati et al., 166 F.2d 348 (9th Cir. 1948). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Freddy’s Fast Food, Inc. et al (Vegas Trademark Attorney) Zambia Is Zambia first-to-file only? [read post]
