Search for: "MARKS v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 21,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am by centerforartlaw
As in the Atari case, Brandy Melville sued Redbubble in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for contributory infringement of the company’s trademark, specifically the Brandy Melville Heart Mark and LA Lightning Mark. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Pay, Productivity, and Innovation During the Time of the Big Shift Wage patterns have been affected by the big shift because companies may recruit people who can work from home in areas of the country marked by lower wages. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
  State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
However, In Arsenal, the ECJ (as it then was) stated that the exclusive rights granted to a trade mark proprietor are “… to enable the trade mark proprietor to protect his specific interests as proprietor, that is, to ensure that the trade mark can fulfil its functions. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Bob Ambrogi
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff; and Chief… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In recent years, many prominent originalists have attempted to demonstrate that the holding in Brown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, these allegations are “utterly refute[d]” by the documentary evidence, which defined the scope of the parties’ engagement and confirmed that defendants had no such duty (Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC, 208 AD3d 152, 157 [1st Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; CPLR 3211 [a] [1]). [read post]