Search for: "MARKS v. STEIN" Results 41 - 60 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Attorney General Josh Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Keith Clayton, for the State-Appellee. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The three-year statute of limitations began to run on March 16, 2017, when a consent to change attorney form was executed by plaintiff, defendant Wallace Law Office, and defendant Leav & Steinberg, LLP (L&S), the incoming counsel (CPLR 214 [6]; Frost Line Refrig., Inc. v Gastwirth, Mirsky & Stein, LLP, 25 AD3d 532, 532-533 [2d Dept 2006]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Reem Plumbing), and the Estate of Steven Stein (Stein) (collectively, plaintiffs) against defendants Altschul & Altschul, Mark Altschul, Esq. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
Parker KINGS COUNTYFamily LawPre-Nuptial Agreement Not Properly Acknowledged By Husband Under DRL §236(B)(3), Unenforceable Stein v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Kittle of the Wisconsin Reporter, Jason Stein of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and Dee J. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Anesthesiology, P.C. v Rosenberg Fortuna & Laitman, LLP, 191 AD3d 864, 866 [alterations and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
The art of trade markapplicationEveryone who filed a Benelux trade mark application between 13 September and 14 November was promised a gift in the form of a painting of their new trade mark by the lovely Benelux PTO. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action accrued on March 20, 2012, when she, acting on the defendants’ advice, filed the bankruptcy petition (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark, 131 AD3d 955, 956; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action, the plaintiff failed to allege with specificity any material misstatements of fact made by the attorney defendants in the divorce action with the intent to deceive that court (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; see also Looff v Lawton, 97 NY 478, 482). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:44 pm
It’s my on the road v. at home ratio for the last two weeks. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]