Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 201 - 220
of 10,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
Slevin Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Oregon Brewing Company, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, No. 16-3602, 27 July 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
United States – with which all other justices in Freeman expressly disagreed – on the theory that it is the “narrowest grounds” of a plurality opinion under Marks v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
On Friday, November 13th, join judges, prosecutors, and attorneys as they convene to mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of Sheppard v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), because a False Marking qui tam relator is not an inferior officer of the government, but rather, is an assignee of a revocable interest of the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:13 am
curid=1636079 Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon) Fit Kitchen Ltd and another v Scratch Meals Ltd [2020] EWHC [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:47 am
The court found that it is inconsistent to give evidence of third-party registrations probative value but find the evidence in no way weakens the opposer’s marks and directed the TTAB to reweigh the likelihood of confusion between the marks (Bad Elf, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Mark United Meth (civil case) [uploaded: 05/31/2012] [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:08 am
" United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
(thetakeaway.org) Events to mark 60 years since Topeka’s Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
William Conley held that the patent marking statute does not violate the "take care" clause of Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:17 am
The lawsuit is Coulier v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
Today marks the 4 year anniversary of the Citizens United decision and tomorrow marks the 41st anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Final tally: at least two reproductions of registered marks or words, and a lot of references to registered marks. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
