Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 61 - 80
of 10,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
See Express Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
Arnstein & Lehr Partners Mark A. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Spognardi Chicago Partner Mark Spognardi is the planning chair for tomorrow’s ALI-ABA teleseminar Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:58 pm
Jacobsparts, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
" Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- With oral argument in the rehearing en banc of Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
In Nazir v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:29 am
Doe and Immigration Law in the United States The St. [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:24 pm
As the nation marks the 60th anniversary of the unanimous Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
The Fortieth Anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's Landmark Decision, Roe V. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
" Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
In doing so, the Federal Circuit established broad standing for private individuals seeking to pursue qui tam actions for false patent marking on behalf of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:25 am
In Maker’s Mark v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:03 am
The court set plaintiff's fine for false marking at $0.35/unit. [read post]
