Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
Here’s the abstract: In Hughes v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:56 am
Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 18-1152, 15 November 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:15 am
"A Path to America, Marked by More and More Bodies," New York Times, 4 May 2017 [text]A Revolving Door No More? [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States, 133 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
S.p.A. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:01 am
McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
Gallegos, supra (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising… [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
