Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
Facts: This case (Waters v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida Denied Preliminary Injunction,
31 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
From today's opinion by Chief Judge Mark Walker (N.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
We have recorded 2,403 communities using identity disclosure versus 2,196 reverse sting operations in cities and counties across the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am
In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Dist., 161 AD3d 1210, 1211; Perez v Tedesco, 214 AD3d 1010, 1012). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
