Search for: "MARSHALL v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 4,384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unlike the Jeffersonian Brandeis, Taft’s heroes were John Marshall and Alexander Hamilton; and like the Federalists, Taft exalted national economic development over states’ rights. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
(a)(5)) (count 5).The complaint alleged that in 2011 and 2012, Amit Marshall, the owner, president, and director of the Alliance School of Trucking (Alliance) obtained approval from the California State Approving Agency for Veterans Education for Alliance to provide non-college degree trucking programs to veterans eligible for benefits under the “Post-9/11 GI Bill” (38 U.S.C., Pt. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
The book greatly influenced Thurgood Marshall, who “referred to the work as ‘the bible’ of Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerald Gunther had been working for decades on the volume on the Marshall Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
” For completeness, he concluded in stating [emphasis added]: “[20]. [read post]