Search for: "MARTIN-MACDONALD v. MACDONALD" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The seminal case of Macdonald Estate v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:46 am by John McKiggan
Minor Injury Cap Doesn't Eliminate All Right to Recovery Chief Justice MacDonald distinguished the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Martin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
For many years now, the prevailing case on injunctions in Canada has been the Supreme Court’s decision in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
  The foundation of this branch of the law is the need to protect the integrity of the administration of justice: MacDonald Estate v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:51 pm
Effectively the change moves closer to the Canadian position articulated by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:27 pm
She is a professor in the Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto; and Co-Director, International Reproductive and Sexual Health Law Programme and University of Toronto.Fred V. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:44 am
Judge Martin Stephens told the men: "You did it to make money quite unconcerned about the misery that the trade would bring to so many people. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
MacDonald in which the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Al-Nashiri’s suit. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]