Search for: "MATTER OF A T J T"
Results 21 - 40
of 10,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 5:01 pm
,R-1 such that g.c.d {qj,p-1} = 1 and qj > 6, qj > q(j-1) for each j = 1, 2, ... [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:08 am
In the Matter of The Honorable Pamela J. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
A statement was also provided by Ms J. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Paul T. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
T 19/87 [5]; T 668/89 [3]; T 417/00 [2.3] T 1829/10 [2.4]). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:11 am
Edited by Gary J. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Note that the Board also does not mention T 1989/18 of 16.12.2021 that concluded that, as a general rule, not is not required to bring the description in line with (amended) claims intended for grant.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:57 am
The director of the William J. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
District Judge Cormac J. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 6:08 am
In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA, the board inter alia raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and under Article 83 EPC with respect to the subject-matter of the independent method claim.VII. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Most of the case law cited by the appellant (T 128/87, T 14/89, J 13/90) is also discussed in G 2/97. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:33 am
There are 3 children of the relationship: T, who is now aged 8, J now aged 12 and K now aged 10.On 3rd February 2005 the father stabbed the mother, who died from her injuries. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 7:37 pm
Offering or accepting any sort of benefit as a consideration for public duties can and is prosecuted in the state, and it isn’t only elected officials who can be penalized. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The opponent also cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal, and J 25/92, wherein it was considered that if a request was uncertain, the EPO should clarify the situation by asking the requester. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
The appellant leaves it to the Board to clarify the contradictions in the first paragraph, to define the prior art mentioned in paragraphs 2 and 3 and to consider which of the two features that have been incorporated into the characterising part, isolated or together, the appellant believes to make the claims novel or patentable.[10] During the written proceedings and partly also during the oral proceedings, the appellant has cited the following decisions in order to support its submissions on the… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
The documents mentioned in the present decision are the following:(1): McPherron, A.C. and Se-Jin Lee, J. [read post]
