Search for: "MATTER OF A T J T"
Results 41 - 60
of 10,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 8:59 pm
By Gerry J. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Randy J. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
(j) Besides, the absence of a definition of when the metering started in the process of claim 1 further added to the lack of clarity of the claimed subject matter.[...]XIV. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
Moreover, the opponent argued that the process of auxiliary request 10 added subject-matter, could not be reproduced by the skilled person, and was obvious from the combination of documents D5 and D7.On 26 February 2016, the opponent filed document D16.VI. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:44 am
Additional Resources: Sports radio host Bertrand ‘OK’ after truck rollover, January 15, 2018, By Laurel J. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Urol. 159(5) Suppl., p. 327, abstract No. 1256D5 Extract from Lexikon Medizin 1997, p. 1180D7 Huard et al. 1998, J. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Urol. 159(5) Suppl., p. 327, abstract No. 1256D5 Extract from Lexikon Medizin 1997, p. 1180D7 Huard et al. 1998, J. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
It has been decided that an Examining Division (ED) does not commit a substantial procedural violation when it fails to follow the Guidelines, unless it also violates a rule or principle of procedure governed by the EPC or one of the implementing regulations (T 42/84 [9]; T 647/93 [4.1]): the failure of a department of the EPO to follow a procedure set out in the Guidelines does not qualify as a substantial procedural violation as the Guidelines are not legally binding (J… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
The BoA concludes that indeed such a delay can be considered a substantial procedural violation (in line with T 823/11 but deviating from T 1824/15). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The fact that this system operated efficiently for many years was evidence that it was normally satisfactory (see T 30/90, J 31/90, J 32/90, T 309/88). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:22 am
J 10/11, T 570/07).From the above it follows that the appeal is likely to be rejected as inadmissible. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
Attorney Richard J. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:56 am
In the Matter of Michael J. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
FRANK J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
In this eight-part interview, Judge J. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, however, Ms Y had, for some inexplicable reason, failed to correct the wrong time limit. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
So now if you can’t get a job, it doesn’t matter, because you still get to eat. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:09 pm
J 3/95 and T 167/93). [read post]
