Search for: "MATTER OF A T J T"
Results 61 - 80
of 10,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The [Search Division] wishes to point out that this deficiency concerns not only the claims, but the whole subject-matter of the original application. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
The publication of priority application EP 1 834 951 A (D1) was among the documents cited during opposition proceedings.The opposition division came to inter alia the following conclusions on the then pending main request:- The claimed subject-matter partially enjoyed the priority date of 10 March 2006 from D1.- D1 was thus not a conflicting application and could not be used against the novelty of the claimed subject-matter.- The claimed subject-matter was novel and… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
Amy J. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, this provision has undergone some change when the EPC 2000 entered into force. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 11/87 [3.3, 3.6]; J 27/94 [8)) and is not allowed to reverse these acts so that they can be considered as never filed (J 10/87 [12]; J 4/97 [2]).On the other hand, the Boards of Appeal considered that R 88 acknowledges as a further legal value the desirability of having regard to true as opposed to ostensible party intentions in legal proceedings (T 824/00 [6]) in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Palmer and to Mr Hans-Jürgen Schmidt in May 1993 (hereinafter disclosure “Schmidt”). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:56 pm
Economic Inquiry, Volume 47 Issue 2 , Pages 197 – 393 (April 2009) DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00154.x The post Early Employment Mediation: Timing Matters appeared first on The Blog of Steven Mehta. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:26 am
David Jentsch says he isn’t intimidated. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
However, the party status of an opponent in opposition proceedings cannot be transferred to examination proceedings, opposition proceedings and examination proceedings being separate proceedings (see T 198/88 [2.1]). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
A 134(8) requires that the legal practitioner be qualified in a Contracting State, that he have his place of business in that State, and that he be entitled in that State to act as a professional representative in patent matters. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This is so even if the subject-matter of the two applications is highly similar (see J 27/94 [3]). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
However the sale of this image of this person on this garment by this shop in these circumstances is a different matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
J 15/04 [13]). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
Today [April 11, 2011], the Supreme Court refiled its opinion, In the Matter of J. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The situation referred to by the ED, whereby subject-matter in respect of which a search fee has not been paid can only be pursued in a divisional application, presupposes that the searched and non-searched inventions are in fact found to be non-unitary when the ED upon review agrees with the opinion of the search division (see decision J 3/09 [5.1-7] and references therein to decisions G 2/92 and T 631/97; see also Guidelines for Examination, C-III, 7.10, third and fourth… [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
According to the minutes […] the OD has concluded that certain amendments did not extend the [claimed] subject-matter beyond the contents of the application as filed, but has identified an essential feature that was not found in claim 1 anymore. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
Die jüngsten der Kammer bekannten Entscheidungen stammen aus den Jahren 2011 und 2012: T 239/08, T 2135/08, T 1600/09, T 207/10, T 648/10 und T 747/10. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Masson-Zwaan (Leiden University, The Netherlands); J. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
This appeal led to a decision by this board in a different composition (cf. decision T 1080/01 cited in [opponent’s] Notice of opposition). [read post]
