Search for: "MATTER OF B B W"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
By Kent B. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:39 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
First, should we provide limited remedies for functional matter under 43(a)? [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:51 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
I at 1393, 1394 (“Neufield Memo”) and (2) the Memorandum fro Paul W. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
offers limits.Samuelson: Software IP lawyers say—w/demise of patentable subject matter after Alice, some say © needs to expand. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
WILLIAM B. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Shows registration matters very little; the court just orders it amended (at the appellate level! [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
These are two sides of the same coin: © protects only works of authors as a constitutional matter. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
Backdoor protection of TM-excluded matter: do we want to understand UC as a matter of not wanting to go beyond TM’s internal limitations, or is it just that TM stops and some other regime starts? [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:48 am
B & B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
We must first determine whether the convictions are directed toward establishing a matter in issue other than Hicks's propensity to sell drugs. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 11:49 am
James W. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
One outgrowth: found evidence of people using US design patent protection to achieve quasi-TM federal rights for logo and other subject matter we’d associate today w/TM. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:04 am
NOTE: My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:47 pm
Plaintiffs argued that “a strict application of Rule 9(b) [would be] unnecessary, unworkable, or unfair” in that, e.g., “advertisements are frequently disseminated over and over, sometimes through multiple channels,” and “ ‘[w]here the allegedly misleading advertising has occurred over a long period of time, it would be unreasonable and contrary to the Sixth Circuit’s liberal construction of Rule 9(b) to require Plaintiff to… [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
By Kent B. [read post]
