Search for: "MATTER OF C M F M AND S M" Results 1 - 20 of 1,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
" Without the letter "M" the mark would appear as the non-sensical word "arissa's. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Pursuant to INA 101(a)(15)(F) and INA 101(a)(15)(M), foreign students in F and M status must “intend to depart from the United States after their temporary period of stay … and have a foreign residence that they have no intention of abandoning”. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
Application for Warrant for E-mail Account [Redacted]@gmail.com, No. 10-291-M-01 (November 1, 2010): In the absence of textual or legislative guidance, this Court concludes that all of Rule 41’s procedural provisions apply to Section 2703(b)(1)(A), including Rule 41(f)(1)(C). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:37 am by Jon Sands
§ 3553(f)(1)(A)–(C) (emphasis added).1 As a matter of first impression, we must interpret the “and” joining subsections (A), (B), and (C) under § 3553(f)(1). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm by Jeffrey
Cover loaf and let rise in a warm place until nearly doubled in size, about 40 minutes.Preheat oven to 450 degrees F (220 degrees C). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of D-M-C-P-, 26 I&N Dec. 644 (BIA 2015); The Board decided that neither the Board, nor the Immigration Courts have jurisdiction to determine if a respondent was properly placed into Asylum-Only Proceedings pursuant to INA § 217. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that This Old Gal’s notice to Apple didn’t comply with 512(c)(3) just highlights its 512(f) deficiency. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
 As well as how the today's decision is consistent (or inconsistent) with how we read 1447(c) in analogous precedent.'Cause I'm just not sure that you "necessarily" decide subject matter jurisdiction before you decide the merits when the two are just different sides of the same coin. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:10 pm by Eric Schweibenz
” The complaint asserts that the following L&M products infringe the intellectual property of Fine Art Lamps: (a) chandelier with L&Ms product number 18288, (b) chandelier with L&Ms product number 18292, (c) semi-flush mount lamp with L&Ms product number 18290, (d) lantern with L&Ms product number 18296, (e) L&Ms pendant lamp,… [read post]