Search for: "MATTER OF DECLARING T E R"
Results 1 - 20
of 948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 12:01 pm
So, prior to Clearwell’s use in this case, e-discovery products have typically not been used in this way. #2: A declaration is an advocacy document, not a ruling from a judge. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 9:53 pm
R. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:04 am
In Ex parte O'Connell, the Board noted that "[a]t best, Appellants’ Declaration evidences a 'conception' date of the invention prior to Li’s effective date. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:30 pm
So why doesn't the same logic apply? [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
” R. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
It's just a matter of incorporating that into your normal O157:H7 testing. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:07 am
Just git-r-done! [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
T 961/00 [1]. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Decisions allowing the request for correction on the basis of R 99(1)(a) and R 101 (2) (R 64 (a) and R 65(2) EPC 1973)(a) In T 340/92, correction of the name of the appellant was allowed and the appeal declared admissible because the erroneous mention of the appellant’s name was held to be due to a confusion between the name of the appellant company (societe Croizet-Pourty) and its parent company (SOGEA). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
However, as already set out, the Chairman of the Board of Appeal read out the requests of the parties, before declaring the debate closed (cf. point III(e) above). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
Posted by Edmund R. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
Thus, this decision is in no way a matter of a debit order submitted without comment, which the Board of Appeal considered an implicit request for correction. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:04 pm
Obama can’t find the passion on economic matters that has been lacking in his campaign so far, he may yet lose this election. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
The best known and most notorious Stx-producing E. coli is E. coli O157:H7. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The fact that the recipient (here: the PR) takes notice of the mail only several days or even weeks after [the receipt] is not relevant because the only legal condition, i.e. the delivery to him, is fulfilled (T 247/98 [1]; T 172/04 [4]; T 743/05 [1.6-8]; T 261/07 [1.6]; T 529/09 [4]).Decision T 703/92, which has been invoked by the [opponent] is not to be understood differently. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
T 2/89 and T 328/87). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
A method for calculating the modular inverse (R) of a value (E) in relation to a module (M), in particular for cryptographic applications, with the steps: a) determining (10) a breakdown of the module (M) into at least two factors (M1, M2), b) calculating (12,14) a respective auxiliary value (R1, R2) for each of the factors (M1, M2) determined in step a), wherein each auxiliary value (R1, R2) is the modular inverse of the value (E) in relation to the respective factor (M1,… [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am
, Plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action in Probate Court seeking a declaration that they were entitled to access the subscriber records of John’s email account (including subscriber information and e-mail header data, but not the e-mails themselves). [read post]
