Search for: "MATTER OF DILLON v. Power"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
After an extraordinarily long wait, the decision in Dillon v DPP [2007] IEHC 480 has finally been published on the website of the Courts Service. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:22 am
In Hayes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Entered: June 30, 2023 Ann Dillon Flynn Clerk of the Court [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Entered: June 30, 2023 Ann Dillon Flynn Clerk of the Court [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm
The Dillon rule allows for grants and revocations of powers. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As Dean Amar noted in his column, in the 1921 case of Dillon v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, ENG and BELEN, JJ., concur. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
The party seeking to vacate an arbitration award thus bears a heavy burden to establish that the arbitrator exceeded their power (see Matter of Asset Protection & Sec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
The party seeking to vacate an arbitration award thus bears a heavy burden to establish that the arbitrator exceeded their power (see Matter of Asset Protection & Sec. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
In the 1921 case Dillon v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Davey, Joseph Dillon. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:04 pm
Bradshaw.This apparently ordinary sale in 2004 was the subject matter of a 48 day trial in 2010, and a three day appeal in 2012.The main question in Bradshaw v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:51 am
A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Carne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
Pisesky is considered a first IME, would the defendants be entitled to seek a further examination pursuant to Rule 30(2). [16] Madam Justice Dillon considered these very issues in Robertson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
Lang v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am
No. 30 – Dillon Aff at~ 13). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Melton Enterprises Ltd v Censorship of Publications Board [2003] 3 IR 623, [2003] IESC 55 (4 November 2003), the Supreme Court upheld the power in section 9 of the Censorship of Publications Act, 1946 (also here) to prohibit the publication of indecent or obscene periodicals. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
Lemen, 156 P.3d 339 (Cal.2007); Sid Dillon Chevrolet v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:50 am
In today’s case (Ceperkovic v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
”His Honour noted that Warnick J in Wayne and Dillon and Dillon [2008] FamCAFC 204 at [18] and [19] said in respect of Rule 11.01(1) of the then Federal Magistrates Court Rules, which are very similar in form to Rule 6.02 of the Family Law Rules: “The word “necessary”… must mean something more than “useful” or “expeditious”. [read post]
