Search for: "MATTER OF G P"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
Accordingly, we have jurisdiction over P&G's appeal if the trial court's stay order had the practical effect of denying P&G's motion for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:43 am
P&G appealed to the Technical Board of Appeal. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
This post assumes that P&G achieved a narrow victory. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
Matter of J-G-P- does not purport to reassess longstanding BIA and Ninth Circuit precedent concerning simple assault offenses, and because it misapplied that precedent, its conclusion is unreasonable. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
Trian’s P&G whitepaper is a unique support document for an activist proxy contest. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:04 pm
P&G filed its application one-month before Henkel, and thus became the senior party in the interference proceeding. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
P&G argued the proposal should be excluded under subsection (i)(7) because the scope of the proposal extended into ordinary business matters. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 8:49 pm
Smucker owned Folgers: In November 2008, P&G completed the sale of its Folgers Coffee business to The JM Smucker Company.See previous IPBiz posts, including:http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/12/p-wins-procedural-matter-in-coffee-wars.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-on-coffee-patent-wars.html [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
Having a criminal record is a serious matter. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
Any superiority message conveyed by P&G’s names and color coding for the two types of cartridges, or by the fact that P & G charges more for Fusion Power cartridges, was “even less specific and verifiable. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:03 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0210, 2011 MT 195, CLIFFORD G. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
So parsimony does matter after all. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
The IRS accordingly levied extra taxes on P&G based on the $722 million. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:14 pm
Usually, administrative processing can be resolved in a matter of weeks but depending on individual circumstances, it can cause multiyear delays. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm
In response, the Patentee wished to rely on post-published data supporting an alternative inventive step argument for the claimed subject matter. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
PHILLIPS, GRANTOR (September 26, 1987), P-440-10 IN THE MATTER OF G. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:34 am
BROUSSARD, THOMAS G. [read post]
8 Mar 2006, 5:12 am
In addition, P&G's own records reveal "voluminous" complaints from consumers who believed that P&G's ads promised equivalence (and were presumably disappointed).P&G argued that any gap between the ads and the truth was not material. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:24 am
Lucy writes: This state-of-the-art machine can be used forwringing the last drop of validity from patents On 2 March, the IPKat reported on Unilever’s “laundry detergent war” against P&G in the Netherlands. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Therefore he concluded that, in the cases of P and Mrs Gallagher there should be a declaration of incompatibility as the disclosures were based on the multiple convictions rule; there should be a declaration in G’s case as the disclosure pertained to a reprimand against a younger offender; but that the appeal should be allowed in W’s case because it was appropriate to include assault occasioning actual bodily harm within the category of offences requiring disclosure. [read post]
