Search for: "MATTER OF J K C"
Results 1 - 20
of 911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 6:55 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0227, 2011 MT 311, IN THE MATTER OF: J.W.C., L.W.C., K.W.C. and C.W.C., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0367, 2012 MT 37N, IN THE MATTER OF: K.J.C., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:01 pm
,R-1, where g.c.d is a greatest common divider and q0 = 1, determining {pj} from {qj} using pP(j) = qj, j = 0, 1, ... , R-1 where P(j) indicates a predetermined inter-row permutation pattern, permuting positions of the information bits in a jth row in accordance with Cj(i) = C([ixpj] mod (p-1)), where j = 0, 1, 2, ... , (R-1), i = 0, 1, 2, ... , (p-2), Cj(p-1) = 0, and Cj(p) = p; performing inter-row permutations according to the predetermined inter-row… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Peters, p/k/a Vince P. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The point was repeated in J 9/12 [3]. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, apart from R 30 itself, the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2007, special edition No. 3, C.1, p. 26) is of relevance. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:02 am
Picture (c) Fortepan / Plohm József More from our authors: Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by Eléonore Gaspar€ 190 International Trademark Licensing by Stojan Arnerstål€ 136 [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [3.5]). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
J.). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:49 pm
One of those symbols is a K for strike price. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
(c) A patent application involves two different aspects. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:30 am
Sep. 30, 2019) (Kendall, J.). [read post]
