Search for: "MATTER OF K J B"
Results 1 - 20
of 942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Vonda K. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:03 am
Justin K. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
This includes defined contribution plans such as 401(k), 401(a) and/or 403(b). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
See points [2.5] and [2(b)] of the reasons and the order, respectively. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:51 pm
Pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court dated 23 December 2010 this matter was transferred from the jurisdiction of the Town of Greece to the jurisdiction of the Town of Parma. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Nov. 5, 2018 Munley, J.), Judge Julia K. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:49 pm
One of those symbols is a K for strike price. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Peters, p/k/a Vince P. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) The EBA did not expressly say (and did not need to say) whether there might be other relevant types of substantive rights. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
However, the lack of any exhaustive statement in respect of the patentability of the subject matter did not limit the appeal proceedings to the allowed correction, because the decision to grant was replaced by the revision decision on 12 June 2006 and the grant proceedings were not terminated before this date. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
How times have changed. yīnwèi wǒde pǔ tōnɡ huà bù jíɡé, Wǒde fēn shù bú ɡòu shànɡ zhongxué，suǒ yǐ，chú le ɡōnɡ zuò hé zài yèxiào xuéxí wǒ miéyǒu biéde xuǎn zé。Na ge shi hou，pǔ tōnɡ huà… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] In the Matter of Stephen J. [read post]
