Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 81 - 100 of 14,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am by Sean Hanover
Hanover Law, PCOffices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DCwww.hanoverlawpc.com 2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 150Fairfax, VA 22031 Sean R. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am by Eleonora Rosati
 This is why The 1709 Blog has decided to launch a poll asking its enthusiastic readers to answer the following question:DO YOU THINK THAT CLOSED SUBJECT-MATTER SYSTEMS ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE UNDER EU COPYRIGHT? [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If you just want a short take-away, here is a translation of the headnotes:“Relevant” in R 104(b) means “suitable for leading to a different outcome of the appeal proceedings”.An objection under R 106 has to be raised expressis verbis; a request for remittal, for postponement or for continuation in writing does not qualify as such an objection. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:30 am
Some important procedural matters in processing disciplinary action Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision 10894 On occasion a determination by the Court or an administrative body is instructive to non-participants because of the procedural matters it discusses. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:32 pm by Mike Mireles
  Does that mean we should look toward broader subject matter or narrow subject matter—both of which could be more certain and stable? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency's efforts to assist the respondent father to improve his deficient parenting skills and to remediate his propensity for domestic violence, the father's aggressive and threatening behavior continued unabated (see Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 841-842 [1986]; see also Matter of Jennifer R., 29 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2006]; Matter of Ajuwon H., 18 AD3d 752 [2005]). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The proprietor then requested the following written statement to be included in the minutes of the OPs: “Respondent is of the opinion that the fact that D24 is admitted so late (1 month prior to OPs) in the proceedings followed by the subsequent denial of the admissibility of late filed claims is in violation of the right to be heard (R 113) [sic] and R 112 [sic]. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a matter of fact, under R 106, a petition under A 112a(2)(c) is only admissible where an objection in respect of the procedural defect was raised during the appeal proceedings and dismissed by the BoA, except where such objection could not be raised during the appeal proceedings. [read post]