Search for: "MATTER OF RATZLAFF" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
Ratzlaff, the Court held, didn’t act “willfully,” because even though he knew of the bank’s reporting requirement (and was acting to evade it), he didn’t know that such evasion was itself a crime, so he could not be said to have acted with a specific purpose to disobey the law. [read post]