Search for: "MATTER OF RATZLAFF"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
” Ratzlaff, the Court held, didn’t act “willfully,” because even though he knew of the bank’s reporting requirement (and was acting to evade it), he didn’t know that such evasion was itself a crime, so he could not be said to have acted with a specific purpose to disobey the law. [read post]