Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 41 - 60 of 3,050
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Docket Navigator
D&M Holdings Inc. d/b/a The D+M Group et al, 1-14-cv-01330 (DED September 9, 2015, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:37 pm by Steve Kalar
See id. at *5 (Reinhardt, J., concurring in opinion, opining that psychological treatment rather than long prison sentences may be better approach); id. at *6 (Noonan, J., concurring in opinion, opining that the gov’t should advertise penalties to advance deterrence). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With a further letter dated 10 November 2020, the patent proprietor clarified its requests and submitted sets of claims G-J and G'-I'.XIII. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm by Jelle Hoekstra
The documents mentioned in the present decision are the following:(1): McPherron, A.C. and Se-Jin Lee, J. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In T 1981/12 [catchword, point 1] the Board considered, in somewhat similar circumstances, that the correct basis for the refusal of the application was that the applicant was not entitled to pursue an application based on subject matter not searched by the EPO. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:43 pm
Nonetheless, “[t]his case was … much more complicated that it appeared to those seeking the s97A order. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:13 am
  Lesson 2:  Know the subject matter of your area of law and don't make simple transactions difficult. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
(b) does any act of extraction and/or re-utilisation by that party occur (i) in A only (ii) in B only; or (iii) in both A and B? [read post]