Search for: "MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHNSON T" Results 1 - 20 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 11:55 am by Michael Grossman
Johnson & Johnson doesn’t feel the venue is appropriate for further trials. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 5:53 am by David Markus
In the spirit of Justice Scalia, the Eleventh Circuit should change course and start allowing district courts to review post-Johnson ACCA petitions the way the other circuits do. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:18 am by David Markus
Buck’s appeal was so meritless that he couldn’t even file it. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 9:44 am by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The post Lundgren & Johnson at the Supreme Court appeared first on Lundgren & Johnson, PSC. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Russell Knight
Furthermore, you could just ask the court for leave to amend your Petition to include those matters. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:13 am
Here is the Olathe News article reporting that when the grand jury called by petition in Johnson County to investigate possible abortion crimes returned no indictment, it also called for review of the statute by which it was called. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The petition for review concerns the decision in appeal T 128/08 revoking the opposed patent. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:30 am
At this point, this last option strikes me as a healthy one, but it is not my opinion that matters. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Petitioner’s reply Title: Johnson Controls v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Jack LaPointe, No. 112,109 (Johnson)State appeal (petition for review)Richard NeyDistrict court properly allowed DNA testingState v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:39 pm by Sandy T. Fox
To speak with an experienced lawyer who focuses exclusively on family law matters today, please do not hesitate to contact the Law Office of Sandy T. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
In Matter of Johnson v New York State Div. of Parole (2009 NY Slip Op 06359 [4th Dept 8/27/09]) an appeal from the dismissal of an Article 78 petition challenging the denial of parole, the Fourth Department reversed and ordered a new parole hearing upon a finding that the Parole Board failed to weigh all of the relevant statutory factors and that there is "a strong indication that the denial of petitioner's application was a foregone conclusion. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:48 am by David DePaolo
He further sought maintenance and cure benefits from PPI under maritime law.PPI sought summary judgment dismissing his claims, asserting it was not Johnson's employer as a matter of law.U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Stating an opinion about the merits of an issue or the claim by itself isn’t disqualifying per se, but additional facts might establish grounds for disqualification. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:59 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
Unfortunately, the petitions to recall Second Ward Council Member Robert Jenkins, Third Ward Council Member John Valdivia, Fifth Ward Council Member Chas Kelley, Sixth Ward Council Member and Mayoral Candidate Rikke Van Johnson and Seventh Ward Council Member Wendy McCammack were unavailable. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:06 am by Marisa N. Hourdajian
Intertate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991) and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]