Search for: "MATTHEW POLLACK" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Matthew Pollack, New York Strikes Back Against Libel Tourism, http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/new-york-strikes-back-against-libel-tourism, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, April 1, 2008, last viewed January 25, 2015. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Zoe Tillman
" Staff writers Matthew Huisman, Andrew Ramonas, Todd Ruger and Zoe Tillman contributed to this report. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:35 pm by Mike Scarcella
Staff writers Amanda Bronstad, Matthew Huisman, Todd Ruger, Mike Scarcella and Zoe Tillman contributed to this report. [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:58 am
Richard Emery, attorney for Matthew Badger, confirmed that a notice of intent to sue the city was filed in early May. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Jack Londen
There is good reason to conclude, as John Pollack says, that state courts are more promising venues than federal courts for seeking recognition of the right. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
 + The Axelrod Family + Debbie & David Bard + Berkowitz Dick Pollack & Brant, LLP and Provenance Wealth Advisors + The Chosed Family + Lloyd Chosed + Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:11 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Gayle Pollack of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB Law Memo 02/12/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
Pollack issued his decision Oct. 27, 2003. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board found however that summary judgment regarding the gross backpay and other amounts for Ronald Hamilton, Matthew Aldrich, and Benjamin Adair was not appropriate because the Respondent set forth specific alternative figures for the pay rates of these three individuals and, accordingly raised a factual issue regarding their pay rates. [read post]