Search for: "MATTOX v. MATTOX" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2008, 9:30 am
Alice White from the Kansas Defender Project won a 1507 motion in Mattox v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:27 am by Carolyn Wright
Her failure to distinguish her copyrighted material and that of the owner of the Indianapolis Photo supports a finding of willfulness in this case.Bell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm by Casey Mattox
Casey Mattox is Senior Counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
 In doing so, the three-judge appellate panel held that "the Nevada Supreme Court's decision upholding the petitioner's convictions was contrary to Mattox v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"That one gets less attention because the damage to transparency wasn't done last session but two decades ago in an episode which most folks - cops and reformers alike - have long forgotten, even if it comes up again and again in police accountability contexts.In 1996, a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 9:02 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Joseph Mattox, No. 111,162 (Johnson)Direct appeal; premeditated first-degree murderCatherine A. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 10:07 am
Mattox (a very frustrating loss for me), State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am by Randall Hodgkinson
WaughImproper admission of prior sexual misconductImproper denial of request for psychological exam of complaining witnessImproper denial of evidence of sexual misconduct by anotherMay 5--Wednesday--a.m.Michael Mattox v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:54 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, [for] a statement that the declarant, while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent, made about its... [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:53 pm
§ 34-1-3 (employer cannot discharge employee who is absent to attend judicial proceeding in response to court order); Mattox v. [read post]