Search for: "MAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY" Results 81 - 100 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Will strengthen NATO and our common security. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by David Jacobson
The Commissioner considered that the complainant was reasonably likely to have been aware that the agency may respond, in the way it did, to the issues raised. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:31 am by Karen Breda
  The way the service works is that the person who believes he or she may be the beneficiary of the deceased loved one's life insurance i) creates a Requestor's Account, ii) certifies to NAIC that he or she has made a diligent search of the deceased's records and property and has asked family members, iii) the requestor submits the deceased's name, birthdate, date of death and social security number to the service, iv) NAIC makes the information… [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
JP Whitter (Water Well Engineers) Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC was heard on 10 May 2018. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 2 May 2024, there was a statement in open court in Percival v Belfield QB-2022-000902. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am by John Jascob
While Gensler said this will begin to set the PCAOB "on a path to better protect investors," Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman called the decision "hasty and truncated. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
Pervasive private-sector passive security video surveillance, facial recognition in digital signage, and photos and videos uploaded to social media could, in theory, be combined and cross-matched. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
14 May 2023, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
May 9, 2023) Selected Jawboning Posts Another Jawboning Case Fails in the Ninth Circuit–Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
By contrast, in A, the claimant – who was part of a domestic violence victims’ Sanctuary Scheme – lived in a three-bedroom apartment adapted to her security needs. [read post]