Search for: "MCCULLY v. MCCULLY"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 12:55 pm
In the recent cast (McCully v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 9:17 pm
H.R.), with introductory note by Jonathan McCully Waldman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
” Jonathan McCully is the Senior Legal Officer of the Media Legal Defence Initiative and Editor at Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court quoted the case of Secretary Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
On 9 February 2017, the European Court of Human Rights handed down an important judgment in Selmani and Ors v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
Jonathan McCully is Legal Officer at the Media Legal Defence Initiative, which filed an [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:05 pm
The EACJ followed the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights (Goodwin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:30 am
A recent court decision, in a case called McCully v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
On 5 December 2014, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the “Court”) delivered its ground breaking judgment on freedom of expression in Lohé Issa Konaté v Burkina Faso (Application No 004/2013 [pdf] (available only in French). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Application of Delfi v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 10:35 am
This is why the recent case of Estate of Kareem Watson et al v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment –… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
Because on a motion to dismiss, the court must accord the plaintiff “the benefit of every possible favorable inference” (Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY 2d 633, 634 [1976]) and deny the motion where the documentary evidence does not “utterly refute” the claim (McCully v Jersey Partners, Inc., 60 AD 3d 562 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiffs’ claim of continuous representation by Herrick survives and… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm
In MTE ([84]), the Court noted the differences between the reputational interests of natural and legal persons, and ‘clearly had its reservations as to whether Article 8 ECHR was actually engaged’ by an injury to corporate reputation (Jonathan McCully). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:09 am
” The third case, McCully v Jersey Partners, Inc., which I previously wrote about here, addresses the issue in the unusual setting of a separate lawsuit decided after the conclusion of a dissenting shareholder fair value appraisal proceeding, in which the now-former shareholder sought to recover tax dividend distributions for the two years preceding the merger pursuant to the provisions of a pre-merger shareholders agreement. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
The Leander Principle: in Leander v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
The winner of this year’s contest was occasional Inforrm contributor and media law blogger, Jonathan McCully. [read post]
