Search for: "MEADS v. HUMAN"
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 6:34 pm
Electron Microscope Image of Human BloodPhotographers: Bruce Wetzel and Harry SchaeferJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Wyeth LLC [2020] EWHC 2636 (Pat) (15 Oct 2020) This was an action by Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd ("MSD") for the revocation of European Patent (UK) 2,676,679 for formulations which stabilize and inhibit precipitation of immunogenic compositions [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
It was right there in the one paragraph I'd excerpted: "a walking human Snapchat app of incoherence. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
For the week* of February 6 – 10: Meads v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
David Mead, posting on the Strasbourg Observers blog, sees this case as a step back for Strasbourg – the case is inconsistent with precedent, including A v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 9:27 am
The case of Crawford v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm
Justice Rooke’s 2012 lengthy decision in Meads v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On the basis that the Patent only provides data from rat models for OAB (i.e. no human clinical trial data or data from human tissue assays), the generics argued that Meade J’s reasoning depended on two uncertainties that the Patent had failed to solve: (1) the uncertainty regarding β3-AR agonism to treat OAB without human clinical trial data; and (2) the uncertainty as to whether mirabegron was a human β3-AR selective agonist or a… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
For the week of March 19 – 26: Meads v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:10 am
Duncan, 2013 ONCJ 160 Meads v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
From last year’s judgment of Associate Chief Justice Rooke in Meads v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
For this last week: Meads v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
In defending himself Duncan employed what Justice Rooke in Meads v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
The physical human beings give notice to governments, creditors, and the Courts that they have relinquished and are separate from their non-physical legal persons and, therefore, are not responsible to follow government regulations, pay taxes, pay debts, etc.In an oft-cited case called Meads v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
The physical human beings give notice to governments, creditors, and the Courts that they have relinquished and are separate from their non-physical legal persons and, therefore, are not responsible to follow government regulations, pay taxes, pay debts, etc.In an oft-cited case called Meads v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
Kettling caselaw – Austin v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
I'm drawn to Scalia's notorious dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
According to Mead, foreign policy decision makers in both the Bush and Obama administration arein favor of the promotion of liberal democracy and human rights. [read post]
