Search for: "MEDICAL SOLUTIONS V C CHANGE" Results 61 - 80 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 3:11 pm
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
” R.C. 4123.01(C)(1) In 2013 the Supreme Court considered the case of  Armstrong v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
The child’s school performance – The student’s grade point average must not fall below a C. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 3:00 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Supreme Court Issues Much Anticipated Decision in Roberts v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The solution requires two changes that law societies have failed to make and will refuse to make until they are made to fear such loss of markets and membership: (1) the management structure of law societies from its 19th century nature; and, (2) the way the work is done to produce legal services. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 5:20 pm
v=SOgW7DWbhek&feature=relatedWill "60 Minutes" be selling a print edition at the supermarket checkout? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The duty to accommodate only requires employers to negotiate a reasonable solution. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:21 pm by James Ridgway
  This approach was endorsed by the Supreme Court in Heckler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Most of the focus was probably on safe harbors b/c players were bigger on both sides: telcos v. big content providers. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
… Courts are reluctant to second-guess a tribunal's decision not to hold an oral hearing and will generally only intervene to prevent manifest unfairness: Xwave Solutions Inc v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]