Search for: "MEDICAL SOLUTIONS V C CHANGE" Results 81 - 100 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am by stevemehta
Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 696, 709; RN Solution, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  His solution is to rid us of private law concepts to become consistent. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Finally, this article will analyze how some of the deadliest terrorist attacks lead to substantial change the way Florida’s Workers’ Compensation statutes (also referred to as “Chapter 440”) address workplace violence. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: drugs v. devices used by a physician: does that form a pattern or change over time and who is the user—the patient or the doctor? [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Morality and social industry norms need to change in this direction. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Even though 200 years ago, doctors and lawyers had very similar work situations, they are very different now because, in the medical profession the innovation in the methods of doing the work to provide medical services never stops. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Bill C-32, An Act related to the repeal of section 159 of the Criminal Code, was intended to address some of the residual impacts of these provisions, the history of which were detailed in Halm v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Bonhoeffer, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin) (21 June 2011)  General Medical Council admission of hearsay evidence in sexual misconduct case involving eminent child cardiologist breached human right to fair trial – key paras: 108, 129. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]