Search for: "METZ v. METZ"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 5:36 am
" Ainger v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
Metz v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:27 pm
" (Armendariz v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Metz v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In a May 8, 2013 decision in Mejia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Metz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Metz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
See also, Strayer v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
Patrick Metze was quoted in the following article: Serena Lin, Austin Am. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Metze’s article The Right to Counsel at Trial: Speaking Truth To Power: The Obligation of the Courts to Enforce the Right to Counsel at Trial is cited in the following article: Mary Vukovich, Deprivation of the Right to Counsel for Federal Pretrial Detainees During the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pandemic, 54 UIC J. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Metz* 39,433 0 2,242 267,974 309,649 Joyce M. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
Amelio 167,233 127,500 0 3,948 299,272 Reuben V. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:46 pm
Heartland LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Smotherman, Reading Between the Wines: Granholm v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Metz, and Stephen J. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
