Search for: "MICHAEL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Holder (May 18, 2012)U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that criminal-law expert and veteran “[d]eputy solicitor general Michael Dreeben, who has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
The Justice Department, joined separately by the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 5:41 pm
CIA Director Michael V. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court, that brief added, should review the question in a case in which the Justice Department had filed a petition — U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Representing the Biden administration, U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In Harris v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am
Justice Department’s effort to seize and forfeit tens of millions of dollars in property. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Department of Justice guidance on profiling. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:52 am
When a justice recuses at the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Solicitor General Michael Dreeben told the justices. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court in Carlesi v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Thus, earlier this week and with the plaintiffs’ consent, the Department of Justice asked the Court to hold the case in abeyance.Despite the high likelihood that the Supreme Court will not hear Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf explains why he finds the statements in Justice Thomas’ plurality opinion in Patchak v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
While Mukasey and Hayden do not explain why it does not survive scrutiny, they are surprisingly countered by torture advocate David Rivkin: At least one high-profile attorney says the declassified Department of Justice memos detailing interrogation techniques prove the U.S. did not torture[.] . . . [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:18 am
But Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
