Search for: "MILLIKEN v. SMITH"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm
In his dissent, Marshall argues that the Milliken decision represents a “giant step backwards,” away from the desegregative and egalitarian orientation of Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
See Milliken & Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:28 am
.” The main sources and entities mentioned in the article: Serious Fraud Office Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers’ Fraud Review Fraud Act 2006 R v Rigby and others (Defense counsel: Mark Milliken-Smith QC of 2 Bedford Row) Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill Criminal Justice Act 2003 For more specifically discussing the recently enacted Fraud Act, see this article by Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP in the same issue of Legal Week. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
In a forthcoming article for the Michigan Law Review, Carter Brace of the University of Michigan Law School explains that the Supreme Court in Milliken v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
