Search for: "MINES v. CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES" Results 1 - 20 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
This transfer was effected indirectly – Dana Corporation transferred its holding in the Indian companies to another group company called Dana World Trade Corporation, which was controlled by DHC. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
The TSX is considered a specialized exchange for mining, and over 60% of the world’s mining companies are listed on the TSX and related exchanges. [read post]
The duty to consult is a constitutional obligation in Canada requiring governments to engage with Indigenous groups when decisions may affect their rights, lands, or resources, as established in the landmark Haida Nation v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am by INFORRM
  The plaintiffs in these defamation cases are an Australian mining company, Mineral Commodities Limited, its South African subsidiaries and some of its officers. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:46 am
Moorgarth Group, [2009] EWCA Civ 629 - is available here, and the point of company law that arises is the extent to which the knowledge or intent/motive of a director is relevant in judging whether the sale of an asset amounts to an unlawful distribution of capital. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
,  There is no general principle that all companies in a group of companies are to be regarded as one. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Florian Mueller
If you look at footnote you will see that PanOptis, which is the company that owns Unwired, is owned by funds managed by affiliates of Brevet Capital Management, a private equity company and Conversant is owned by a group of investors led by Sterling Partners, another private equity company. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm by Steve Lubet
THE BLACKLIST IN THE COAL MINE By David Greenberg, Rebecca Lesses, Jeffry V. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by John Jascob
Ludwin extended the mining hypothetical, asking, if you mine gold, “Do you have a contract with the Earth? [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Consistent with Akorn and the subsequent U.S. case of Snow Phipps Group LLC v KCake Acquisition Inc, the Court found no bright line test for materiality. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 8:02 am by Lyle Roberts
Ohman J:or Fonder AB v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:44 am
Broche BRONX COUNTYCivil PracticeDiscontinuance Granted; Co-Defendants May Still Litigate Against DefendantTreuhold Capital Group LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday I became aware of a 19-page document (PDF) explaining why research-centric investment group Kerrisdale Capital has decided to shortsell Qualcomm's (QCOM) shares, with a particular emphasis on the fallout from the ongoing FTC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by CMS
The Claimants were successful on appeal to the Court of Appeal and, thereafter, the Bank appealed to the Supreme Court in February 2017 (Akers and others  v Samba Financial Group [2017] UKSC 6). [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]