Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
The statement was made by Minister of State for Defense Ajay Bhatt in response to a question raised by Kerala MP V. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
” There is no set doctrine for ministers to accept, nor is there a mandate that ministers must believe in God. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
In Clover Hill Reformed Church v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:00 am
Lippard v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 5:55 pm
In Carmichael v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 12:19 pm
Loughman criticized the security pact, stating that it compromises the neutral status of Vanuatu and potentially jeopardizes assistance from China. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
United States, a 2016 Supreme Court case. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
Adam Chodorow (Arizona State) has written a brief analysis of Gaylor v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:14 pm
As we mentioned a few weeks ago, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty recently stated that legislation to create a national securities regulator was imminent. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 12:05 pm
On Aug. 26, the Israeli Supreme Court, in the case of Tziam v. the Prime Minister, ordered the state to grant the petitioners, five Palestinian women living in Gaza who required life-saving medical treatment, permission to enter East Jerusalem for the purpose of receiving healthcare. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Again Lord Keen QC notes that he would come to the rational reason shortly. 15:43: Lord Keen QC turns to address Lord Pannick’s submissions on the absence of a witness statement from the Prime Minister. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 11:34 am
In Carter v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:06 am
The justices will hear oral argument in Fulton v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 10:49 pm
Heyer v. [read post]
