Search for: "MIRANDA v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
This is a well-deserved honor,” said Loretta Miranda, Vice President of the CILA Board of Directors. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
California. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Hurd v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm
The first case, In re Search of a Residence in Aptos, California, 2018 WL 1400401 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
Furthermore, the relevant inquiry under Thompson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
Waldrip v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
In a Kern County, California strip search case, the court finds that group strip searches were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
So I hope it comes as no surprise to anyone that the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms the conviction and death sentence.And if doing so requires the court to hold (as it does here) that the public safety exception to Miranda applies and allows the police to continue to question a suspect -- and use the resulting testimony against him at trial -- even after he's invoked his right to counsel, so be it. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
The officer informed defendant of his Miranda rights, and defendant admitted that he regularly sold marijuana. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Additional Resources: Hernandez-Miranda v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
The California courts deemed the petitioner's requests for counsel equivocal under Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 6:18 am
California, January 27, 2011. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:13 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
This month, the California Supreme Court said “no” in the case Hassell v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 12:51 pm
However, the California Supreme Court provided eight requirements that law enforcement officers must follow when utilizing a sobriety checkpoint in the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
The California Supreme Court affirms the conviction and death sentence in this case, in which the defendant represented himself (always unwise) and waived the right to a jury trial (almost always unwise in a capital case). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:24 pm
Ortiz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:57 pm
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 291, 310 (Munoz) and Miranda v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
The California Court of Appeal was wrong. [read post]
