Search for: "MITCHELL v. HICKS"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland), heard 7 July 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:34 am
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Hicks rule This case is a State appeal from the dismissal of the indictments in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City based upon an alleged violation of Maryland Code of Criminal Procedure § 6-1031 and Maryland Rule 4-271, commonly known together as the Hicks rule. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
Hicks, because the court of appeals opinions, including the Eighth Circuit opinion in Smith v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
Hicks, 2016 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Roskelley, Hicks & Walt, Las Vegas, NV, for the defendants-appellees. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard on 5 July… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 1:49 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard on 5 July… [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June 2016 Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc, heard on 23 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June 2016 Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc, heard on 23 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
On Thursday it will also hear the appeal in R v Mitchell, which considers the use of non conviction bad character evidence by the prosecution, where it comes to the jury taking such evidence into account in determining the guilt of the defendant. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
