Search for: "MITSUI "
Results 81 - 100
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:19 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 682 The issue before the Supreme Court was the quantification of riot compensation claims, including a question of statutory construction: whether persons who suffer loss when rioters destroy their property can in principle obtain compensation for consequential losses, including loss of profits and loss of rent, under Riot (Damages) Act 1886, s 2. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:30 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:34 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:21 am
On 21 January 2016, the Supreme Court heard an appeal to determine whether claimants are entitled under the Riot Damages Act 1886 to obtain compensation for not only repairing the damage done to property during a riot but also for any loss of profit which may consequently have flowed from that damage and for other indirect adverse economic consequences of the riot. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:00 am
On Thursday 21 January it will hear the appeal of The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors regarding whether the respondent’s, whose property and equipment was completely destroyed by rioters who broke into their distribution warehouse in August 2011, are entitled under the Riot Damages Act 1886 to obtain compensation for not only repairing the damage done to property during a riot but also for any loss of profit which may… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:52 am
On 21 January 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the case of The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors regarding whether the respondent’s, whose property and equipment was completely destroyed by rioters who broke into their distribution warehouse in August 2011, are entitled under the Riot Damages Act 1886 to obtain compensation for not only repairing the damage done to property during a riot but also for any loss of profit… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
The application was filed by, among others, two residents — Joseph William Kent and Yoshimasa Sean Mitsui — who say they cannot qualify under the definition the state set up for “native Hawaiian. [read post]
