Search for: "MITTS v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2012, 5:50 am
These cases involve challenges to the DOMA or to state laws that define marriage to the exclusion of same-sex couples.We here at the Law Blogger have been following this issue over the past few years; here are some of our earlier posts tracking the subject:Illinois Becomes 6th State to Recognize Same-Sex Unions January 2011Same-Sex Marriage Cases Go Constitutional April 2010There are three cases in the same-sex marriage pack that seem to be headed… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm
United States, Celebrities, Immigration, LSAC, LSAT, Mitt Romney, Non-Sequiturs, Politics, Republican Nomination, Rob Portman, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, University of Michigan Law School [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
” As proof, he cited Wickard v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion for preliminary injunction challenging a 70-year old federal ban on campaign contributions from government contractors in Wagner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
MITT ROMNEY (R): It's really quite a curious turn of events for him to start complaining about an activist court. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
In his dissent in Richardson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:08 am
” The 10th Amendment argument is a common line of attack by Republicans, including Mitt Romney, invoked to argue that ‘Obamacare’ tramples states rights. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Various parties heard yelling 'I'll broker your convention' after three too many fingers of scotch - President Obama schedules a second State of the Union speech, grabbing primetime media slots. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
And there were plenty of states where you couldn’t hold public office if you didn’t swear to believe in God (as opposed to Allah, Buddha or a flying plate of spaghetti) until the Torcaso v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm
In Brehm v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
When he heard that a complaint had been filed against "Defendants Does 1-10, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum" for infringement of Frank Weyer's United States patent, US7644122B2, this Kat wasn't sure whether this was serious or just an April Fools' prank come early. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
by Dennis Crouch EveryMD v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:02 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: Cover of Jean Dujardin "The Artist's Jean Dujardin apologises for using French swear word during acceptance speech" pjblack.me/A6rLRf high court to hand down its decision in wotton v qld on prisoners' rights & civil & political freedoms tomorrow pjblack.me/xXOfny #lwb242 lol oops: "Facebook made this guy a spokesperson for personal lubricant" pjblack.me/xOft4x … [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:43 am
by Dennis Crouch EveryMD v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
Richard Kahlenberg observes that Fisher v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
Flomo v. [read post]
