Even when some gains appear to have been made, as Sari Graben and Christian Morey note regarding the definition of “Aboriginal title” (p. 287) in the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia, the Crown retains the “potential for infringement … [if the] title lands can be used for large-scale infrastructure or resource development deemed to be in the public interest” (p. 302). [read post]