Search for: "MOTOROLA V US" Results 1 - 20 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 9:28 am by Doug Panzer, Esq.
This strategy is currently being played out by tech giants Apple and Motorola Mobility.Apple v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:50 am by Jon Brodkin
Judge James Robart of US District Court in Seattle is tasked with deciding what is a "fair and reasonable" rate for the license fees Microsoft should pay Motorola for use of patents tied to H.264 video and Wi-Fi standards. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:20 pm by Megan Geuss
Last week, Ars reported that the judge canceled the upcoming jury trial for this particular Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Some pending US litigation: Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:34 am by admin
Xoom is not a particularly large company and it appears that it will be hurt financially by use of the the Xoom mark by Motorola. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:04 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held a Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
And Motorola's argument that an ex ante (before standardization) perspective on FRAND rates is not acceptable runs counter to Judge Posner's position on FRAND royalties in Apple v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Florian Mueller
It wants information "regarding the cellular networks [Sprint] provides to its customers and the operation and use of the accused Motorola cellular phone handsets in connection with those networks". [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:11 am
On the other hand, about 60 percent of all smart phones in the world use Google's Android system. [read post]