Search for: "MOTOROLA V US"
Results 61 - 80
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Nextel Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
For a long time I’ve been meaning to write a post about the ongoing saga of the Seventh Circuit appeal in Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:00 am
In Apple v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
” Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:42 am
The instant case - the Motorola v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:59 am
By Dennis Crouch Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
Judge Robart particularly relies on the Federal Circuit's Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:45 am
Two years ago Judge Posner wrote an opinion in Apple v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:05 am
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
That technique may slightly reduce network traffic and battery consumption, but end users simply wouldn't notice if Apple and/or Microsoft (if they even use the technique today, which I don't know) deactivated it. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:23 pm
Google and, before Google acquired it, Motorola never really liked the Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:18 am
If interpreted that broadly, it should be held invalid as Judge Arnold determined today.The decision comes ahead of a trial scheduled by the Mannheim Regional Court for February 1, 2013, which will be the second trial (after a reopening of proceedings following the first one) in this Motorola v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
Today the public redacted version of Google's (Motorola's) reply brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:43 am
Obviously, even a broader ban is useful only if actually enforced, but that's what Microsoft is fighting for.This morning the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed in part with Microsoft that the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) should have ordered an import ban against Motorola's Android-based devices over more than just one patent. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Keating v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:04 am
In May 2013 Google also appealed the dismissal of another patent-in-suit, which relates to the use of a proximity sensor.Apple's appeal of the ITC's dismissal of its case against Motorola succeeded in very significant parts last month. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:05 am
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm
In the event of a withdrawal, Motorola could have claimed later (on appeal) that Microsoft had waived certain arguments or that it used surprise tactics by raising them on appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The case is Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
